-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2017
Description
Update: November 21, 2017
Notice of Intent to Award
Update: August 11, 2017
Revised Schedule
Update: May 22, 2017
Short Listed Proposers
It is the intent of Judicial Council of California, Judicial Branch of Capital Projects to enter into contracts with the following firms for services set forth in the Request for Qualifications. Final selection is pending contract negotiations.
Update: May 17, 2017
Revised Schedule
Update: April 26, 2017
Questions and Answers
Reminder: RFQ proposals are due May 4, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. (PDT). Ensure to return all necessary Attachments to the RFQ filled out and signed as needed with your proposals.
The selected Proposer(s) will provide a consultant team to study structural, architectural, cost and operation issues involved with a renovation of structural and other building components to meet seismic standards, as described below.
- Selected Consultant(s) shall work closely with Judicial Council of California (“Judicial Council”) staff in studying the structural, architectural, cost, and operation issues involved with a renovation of structural and other building components in up to 25 existing court buildings that will be identified by the Judicial Council. Each subject court building will have a separate report consisting of feasibility issues, cost benefit and schedule.
- Qualifications Of Desired Consultants
The Council seeks consultant teams comprised of key individuals in disciplines listed in this section, who have current knowledge and experience of building renovations (disciplines are not listed in order of importance)- Structural Engineering:
Conceptual analysis designs to improve building performance under seismic loads. Advising public agencies on comparative approaches to building renovations. Optionally, experience with managing consultants of different design and construction disciplines to deliver services to an owner/client. Key individuals in this discipline shall be licensed structural engineers in California. - Architecture:
Conceptual analysis of comparative approaches to building renovations. Coordinating and leading design and construction consultants to efficiency complete studies and reports. Author of reports that combine written and graphic explanations to convey technical information; comparative analysis and recommendations or conclusions consistently and clearly. Key individuals in this discipline shall be licensed architects in California. - Cost Consultant:
Conceptual cost analysis of options for building renovation, preparing and advising owners on cost benefit analysis of the feasibility of renovating an existing building. - Mechanical/Electrical Engineering:
Conceptual analysis of approach to renovation of systems in existing buildings. Key individuals in this discipline shall be licensed engineers in California. - Construction Management:
Conceptual analysis of schedule and construction attributes of alternate approaches to renovation of existing buildings.
- Structural Engineering:
Questions regarding the RFQ should be submitted in writing to the Judicial Council of California via CapitalProgramSolicitations@jud.ca.gov on April 21, 2017, by end of business day.
Proposals must be received by no later than 2:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on May 4, 2017.
Hard copies of proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn.: Lenore Fraga-Roberts –JBCP-CBR-Feasibility Studies-2016-60-SM
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Further details regarding this solicitation and work requirements are set forth in the RFQ# JBCP-CBR-Feasibility Studies-2016-60-SM, Court Building Renovation Feasibility Studies and the related documents listed below:
RFQ JBCP-CBR-Feasibility Studies-2016-60-JP
Attachment 1 - Standard Agreement Standard Agreement Draft
Attachment 2 - Governing Rules Administrative Rules Governing RFPs (Non-IT Services)
Attachment 3 - Acceptance of T’s & C’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions Form
Attachment 4 - General Certifications General Certifications Form
Attachment 5 - Payee Data Record Payee Data Record Form
Attachment 6 - Questions Form Submittal of Questions Firm
Attachment 7 - Background Check Internal Background Check Policy
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.