Invitation for Bid

HP Server Equipment Refresh Phase 2 per Quantities and Specifications for IFB-ISD-9202017-AA

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2017

Description

Update: October 13, 2017
Intent to Award

Update: September 28, 2017
Questions and Answers

The Judicial Council of CA (JCC) is seeking firms to provide bids for HP Server Equipment Refresh Phase 2 as detailed in the invitation to Bid # IFB-ISD-9202017-AA.

NOTE: Questions regarding this IFB should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by Wednesday September 27, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. (PDT).

Proposals must be received by Wednesday October 11, 2017, no later than 12:00 p.m.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Alfonso Acosta, IFB-ISD-9202017-AA
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further specific details regarding the solicitation requirements are set forth in IFB-ISD-9202017-AA and related documents provided, below:

IFB-ISD-9202017-AA

Specifications and Quantities

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing IFBs

Attachment 2 - JBCL Terms and Conditions

Attachment 3 - Bidders Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - General Certifications Form

Attachment 5 - Darfur Act

Attachment 6 - Unruh Civil Rights Act and FEHA Certification

Attachment 7 - DVBE Declaration

Attachment 8 - DVBE Vendor Declaration

Attachment 9 - Small Business Declaration

Attachment 10 - Payee Data Record STD 204

Attachment 11 - Pricing Sheet for Vendor

Attachment 12 - Criteria for Evaluation/Points

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.