-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2021
-
ID#FS-2021-13-AL
Description
Update: December 23, 2021
Attachment 2, Standard Agreement (revised 12/23/2021)
Update: December 10, 2021
Notice of Intent to Award
Update: December 2, 2021
Notice of Shortlist for Interviews
Update: November 9, 2021
Addendum 01 (including updated RFP Schedule of Events)
Response to Questions
Update: October 29, 2021
Addendum 01
Attachment 2, Standard Agreement (revised 10/29/2021)
The Judicial Council, through this Request for Proposal (“RFP”) is soliciting Proposals from Firms, (“Firm(s)”) to provide Criteria Architect services necessary to develop a long-range strategic plan for improving and modernizing superior court facilities of Los Angeles County (“Project”). The responsible party shall be an architect licensed to practice in California, a registered professional engineer to practice in California, or a Certified Planner. Firm team shall comprise of all disciplines necessary to effectively perform the required services. The selected team shall be experienced with designs of similar size, complexity, and nature.
The Criteria Architect that is selected will enter into a Standard Agreement ("Agreement") with the Judicial Council for the Courthouse. The Judicial Council anticipates the Agreement will be issued to a single Criteria Architect under this RFP.
A pre-proposal conference will be held on Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 10:30 AM Pacific Time (PT). The pre-proposal conference will be held video meeting platform Microsoft Teams:
Join on your computer or mobile app Click here to join the meeting Join with a video conferencing device 178332609@teams.bjn.vc Video Conference ID: 113 101 822 6
Alternate VTC instructions
Or call in (audio only) +1 415-906-0569,687503834# United States, San Francisco Phone Conference ID: 687 503 834#
Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted in writing to the Judicial Council via Solicitations@jud.ca.gov no later than 5:00 PM Pacific Time on Thursday, October 21, 2021.
Proposals must be received no later than 5:00 PM Pacific Time on Friday, November 12, 2021.
Only electronic proposals will be accepted. Proposals must be emailed no more than three (3) days in advance of the proposal due date to the following email addresses: For Non-Cost Proposal email to: fs202113al.soq@jud.ca.gov For Cost Proposal email to: fs202113al.fee@jud.ca.gov
Further details regarding this solicitation and work requirements are set forth in the RFP Number: RFP-FS-2021-13-AL , Criteria Architect services for the Los Angeles Master Plan and the related documents listed below. All Attachments are posted to the RFP webpage as separate documents.
Request for Proposal: RFP-FS-2021-13-AL
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1, Administrative Rules Governing Request for Proposals Attachment 2, Standard Agreement Attachment 3, Consultant Personnel Billing Rates Attachment 4, Proposer’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions Attachment 5, General Certifications Form Attachment 6, Darfur Contracting Act Certification Attachment 7, Architect-Engineer Qualifications (Standard Form 330) Attachment 8A, Payee Data Record (STD 204) Attachment 8B, Payee Data Record Supplement (STD 205) Attachment 9, DVBE Participation Form Attachment 10, Form for Submission of Questions
Attachment 11, Iran Contracting Act Certification (for solicitations of $1,000,000 or more)
Attachment 12, Unruh Civil Rights Act and California Fair Employment and Housing Act Certification (for solicitations of $100,000 or more)
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A, Districts Map
Exhibit B, 2019 Prioritization for Trial Court Capital-Outlay Projects
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.