Request for Quote

Environmental Services Consultants, RFQ# REFM-2016-03-MS

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2016

Description

Update: July 28, 2016
Notice of Intent to Award


Update: June 17, 2016
Responses to Previously Submitted Questions
Updated Attachment 1 - Standard Master Agreement
Updated RFQ Environmental Services


Judicial Council of California seeks to develop a list of Environmental Services Consultants to provide any of a range of services related to existing and new California Court facilities.

Written statement of qualifications must be received no later than 2 P.M. Pacific Time on June 29, 2016.

Requests for clarifications, modifications or questions must be submitted to CapitalProgramSolicitations@jud.ca.gov no later than 3 P.M. Pacific Time on Monday, June 13, 2016.

Hard copy of RFQs must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden – REFM-2016-03-MS
455 Golden Gate Avenue – 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth below.

Request for Qualifications/Proposals (through Attachment 9) (Updated June 17, 2016)

Attachment 1 - Standard Master Agreement (Updated June 17, 2016)

Attachment 2 - Administrative Rules Governing RFQs

Attachment 3 - Proposer's Acceptance of Terms & Conditions

Attachment 4 - General Certifications Forms

Attachment 5 - Darfur Certification

Attachment 6 - Payee Data Record

Attachment 7 - DVBE Declaration Form

Attachment 8 - Bidder Declaration Form

Attachment 9 - Form for Submission of Questions

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.