Request for Proposal

Optimizing Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs to Efficiently Use Court Resources

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2012
  • ID#
    OGC-ADR-01(B)-LM

Description

Cancellation Notice

The Administrative Office of the Courts seeks the services of a qualified consultant with expertise in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) to analyze currently available information and data about California court-connected ADR programs for general civil cases and small claims, unlawful detainer, and civil harassment proceedings and prepare a report, of statewide relevance, to help courts determine the optimum program types and service models to efficiently use their limited resources.

Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by April 24, 2012, no later than 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time.
Proposals must be received by May 4, 2012, no later than 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP: OGC-ADR-01(B)-LM
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation and program requirements are set forth in the RFP and related documents provided, below:

RFP: OGC-ADR-01(A)-LM

Table of Contents

Attachment 1 – Administrative Rules Governing RFPs

Attachment 2 – AOC Standard Terms and Conditions (Appendix A and Appendix B)

Appendix A - DOC | PDF

Appendix B - DOC | PDF

Attachment 3 – Vendor’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 – Payee Data Record Form

Attachment 5 – Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 6 – Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Questions and Answers

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.