Request for Quote

Request for Qualifications to develop a list of Energy Services Consulting Companies, RFQ# REFM-2015-13-DM

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2015

Description

Update: October 22, 2015

This is a notification that the Judicial Council intends to negotiate with the following companies for energy efficiency projects:

  • Ameresco Southwest
  • Pacific Gas & Electric
  • Highlands Diversified Inc
  • Pacific Lighting & Energy Mngmt
  • Clark Realty
  • ARC Alternatives
  • Waterwise Consulting Inc
  • ABM Franchising Group
  • Climatec BTG
  • Comfort Intl
  • Enovity
  • Opterra
  • Newcomb Anderson McCormick

Individual projects will be negotiated on a project by project basis. The Judicial Council wishes to thank all organizations that participated in this RFQ process.

Update: August 11, 2015

Addendum 2

Update: August 4, 2015

Addendum One - Questions and Answers

The Judicial Council of California seeks to retain the services of qualified Energy Services Consulting companies with expertise energy efficiency and water conservation for Courthouse facilities throughout the State.

Written statement of qualifications must be received no later than 2 p.m. on Tuesday, August 14, 2015.

Requests for clarifications or modifications must be submitted to CapitalProgramSolicitations@jud.ca.gov by no later than 4 p.m. on Tuesday, July 28, 2015.

Hard copy SOQs must be delivered to:

Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden – REFM-2015-13-DM
455 Golden Gate Avenue – 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in RFQ No. REFM-2015-13-DM

Request for Qualifications (through Attachment 4)

Attachment 5 - Darfur Contracting Certification Form

Attachment 6 - Payee Data Record Form

Attachment 7 - DVBE Participation Form

Attachment 8 - Form for Submission of Questions

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.