-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2016
Description
The Judicial Council of California, Operations & Programs Division, Capital Program office seeks to identify and select an architectural consultant and their consulting engineering team qualified to provide services in all phases of pre-design, design and construction of the new courthouse for the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
Update: April 11, 2016:
Selected Architect: CO Architects
Update: March 22, 2016:
Short Listed Proposers:
| A/E Firms (in alphabetical order) | Address | Location |
|---|---|---|
| AC Martin Partners | 444 S. Flower St | Los Angeles, CA |
| CO Architects | 5055 Wilshire Blvd | Los Angeles, CA |
| DLR Group | 1050 20th St | Sacramento, CA |
| Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP | 555 W. 5th St | Los Angeles, CA |
| Zimmer Gunsel Frasca Architects | 515 S. Flower St | Los Angeles, CA |
Update: February 24, 2016
Questions Submitted with Judicial Council Responses
Update: February 16, 2016
List of Attendees: Telcon Held 02/10/16
Update: February 9, 2016
The Call in Number for the February 10, 2016 Telcon is 877-820-7831 and passcode for all to use is 588979.
Modified RFQ Schedule, Effective February 9, 2016:
| Event: | Date: |
|---|---|
|
Pre-submittal conference |
2/10/Wed 11 AM - Noon |
|
Deadline for submittal of questions |
2/18/Thu 5pm |
|
Answers to questions |
2/25/Thu |
|
Submittal Deadline |
3/3/Thu 2pm |
|
Posting of short list |
3/22/Tue (estimated) |
|
Interviews of short listed in Burbank |
4/4/Mon |
|
Posting of notice of intent to award |
4/8/Fri (estimated) |
RFQ Documents:
Attachment A - Project Description
Attachment B - Qualifications Questionnaire
Attachment C - Form for Submission of Questions
Attachment D - Payee Data Record Form
Note: There is no Legal Document posted to this RFQ at this time. Legal Document will be published to this web posting at some time in the future.”
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.