-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2012
Description
The California Center for Judicial Education and Research, as the Education Division of the Administrative Office of the Courts, seeks the services of a provider with expertise in commercial book publishing to print new editions of the Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts’ publications:
- Felony Sentencing Handbook,
- Mandatory Criminal Jury Instructions Handbook,
- California Judges Benchbook: Search and Seizure, and
- California Judges Benchbook: Domestic Violence Cases in Criminal Court.
Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov by July 23, 2012, no later than 3:00 P.M. Pacific Time.
Proposals must be received by July 31, 2012, no later than 3:00 P.M. Pacific Time.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP: CJER HB 0712-LM
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation and program requirements are set forth in the RFP and related documents provided, below:
RFP: CJER HB 0712-LM
Table of Contents
Attachment 1 – Administrative Rules Governing RFPs
Attachment 2 – AOC Standard Terms and Conditions (Appendix A and Appendix B)
Attachment 3 – Vendor’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 – Payee Data Record Form
Attachment 5 – Darfur Contracting Act Certification
Attachment 6 – Conflict of Interest Certification Form
Questions and Answers
Intent to Award
Notice of Award
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.