Request for Proposal

Mechanical and HVAC Inspection and Preventive Maintenance, RFP# 4/2 RFP 13/14-06

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2014

Description

The Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, Division 2, located at 3389 12th Street, Riverside, CA 92501, seeks to identify and retain the services of a contractor with expertise in providing professional Mechanical and HVAC Inspection and Preventive Maintenance services.

Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted in writing to the Court via paula.garcia@jud.ca.gov by Close of Business on February 10, 2014.

Proposals must be received by no later than 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on February 24, 2014.

Hard copies of proposals must be delivered to:
Paula D. Garcia
Assistant Clerk/Administrator
Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, Division 2
3389 12th Street
Riverside, CA 92501

Further details regarding this solicitation and work requirements are set forth in the RFP# 4/2 RFP 13/14-06, Mechanical and HVAC Inspection and Preventive Maintenance and the related documents below:

Request for Proposals - Mechanical and HVAC Inspection and Preventive Maintenance

Attachment - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs (Non-IT Services)

Attachment 2 - Court Standard Terms and Conditions

Attachment 3 - Acceptance of Court Standard Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - General Certification Form

Attachment 5 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification Form

Attachment 6 - Payee Data Record Form

Questions and Answers

Intent to Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.