Request for Proposal

Judicial Council San Francisco Room Block, RFP# CRS SP 230

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2017

Description

Update: September 18, 2017
Intent to Award


The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services seeks proposals from hotels for sleeping rooms, January 9-12, 2018 and February 27-March 2, 2018 and July 17-20, 2018 and September 18-21, 2018 and November 27-30, 2018 in San Francisco, California.

Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY Pacific Time, Friday, August 18, 2017.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS SP 230
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Proposals may now be submitted via e-mail. E-mail proposals must be e-mailed to: ConferenceRFPs@jud.ca.gov Subject line: RFP No. CRS SP 230.

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS SP 230.
The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, not commissionable.

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs

Attachment 2 - Hotel Agreement Template

Attachment 3 - Vendor's Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 5 - Submission Form for Technical and Cost Proposal

Attachment 6 - Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.