Request for Proposal

Court-Appointed Counsel Performance Evaluation

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2007

Description


RFP Number: CFCC-042007-RB

The AOC seeks the services of a highly qualified provider with expertise in survey dissemination and analysis, court user interviews and qualitative and quantitative research methods, to implement a dependency attorney performance survey process in the ten court systems participating in the DRAFT pilot program.

The performance surveys will evaluate dependency attorneys primarily in the court-based performance of their dependency practice. The performance survey process comprises annual judicial officer, peer and client surveys. The results of these surveys will be compiled and shared with evaluated attorneys as a tool for self-assessment and improvement.

Any questions regarding RFP No. CFCC-042007-RB must be sent tosolicitations@jud.ca.gov no later than 5:00 p.m., May 4, 2007.

Written proposals must be received by the Administrative Office of the Courts, at the address provided below, no later than 1:00 p.m., on May 25, 2007.

Proposals must be delivered to:

    Judicial Council of California
    Administrative Office of the Courts
    Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP #CFCC-042007-RB
    455 Golden Gate Avenue, 7th Floor
    San Francisco, CA 94102

Further details regarding solicitation and program requirements are set forth in the Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CFCC-042007-RB below.

RFP

  • DOC Format (573 KB) | PDF Format (205 KB) | April 16, 2007

Addenda

Intent to Award Notice

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.