Request for Proposal

Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute, RFP #CRS PD 192

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2016

Description

Update: September 2, 2016
Intent to Award


Update: July 29, 2016
Questions and Answers


The Judicial Council of California, Conference Services Unit seeks proposals from hotels for a full conference in San Francisco, San Francisco Airport area, San Jose or Oakland for the Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute program.

Questions can be directed to conferencesolicitations@jud.ca.gov until end of business day Thursday, July 28, 2016. Questions and answers received will be posted on Friday, July 29, 2016.

Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY, Friday, August 5, 2016.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS PD 192
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS PD 192

The Judicial Council of California, Conference & Registration Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, not commissionable.

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs

Attachment 2 – Judicial Council of California Hotel Agreement Template

Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical Requirements and Cost Proposal

Attachment 6 – Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.