Request for Proposal

Master Agreements for Information Technology Consulting Managed Services

The Judicial Council seeks information technology (IT) consulting services and support to address the evolving needs of the Judicial Council of California, Superior Courts, Appellate Courts, the Supreme Court, and other California Judicial Branch Entities. Accordingly, this RFP seeks proposals from interested vendors (Proposers) that can provide such services that meet the IT needs of JBEs that elect to participate in any Master Agreement that result from this RFP.
  • Status
    Open
  • Topic
    Non-Facilities Contracts - Information Technology
  • Deadline
  • ID#
    RFP-IT-2025-203-RB

Description

The goal of this RFP is to establish Master Agreements with exceptional Proposers, up to ten (10) per geographic region for an initial three (3) year term with three (3) additional consecutive one-year option terms for a potential maximum term of six (6) years.  The initial term of each Master Agreement is anticipated to cover the period of 7/1/2026 through 6/30/2029 (estimated).  Each of the option terms may only be exercised at the Judicial Council’s sole discretion. For each job classification, Proposers must identify in their proposals the specific Region or Regions that they are bidding on. JBEs that elect to purchase services, by selecting IT consultant candidates to assist with IT projects in accordance with the Work Order Request process under a Master Agreement, will enter into a Participating Addendum with the vendor that the JBE selects.  

PROPOSALS DUE:  February 24, 2026, no later than 1:00 P.M. Pacific time

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.