Request for Proposal

Civil Law Institute, CRS SP 323

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2020
  • ID#
    CRS SP 323

Description

Update: February 11, 2020
Intent to Award


The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services seeks proposals from hotels for sleeping rooms, August 31-September 2, 2020 or September 9-11, 2020 in San Francisco, California.

Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY Pacific Time, January 21, 2020.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS SP 323
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

E-mail proposals:
Proposals may now be submitted via e-mail. E-mail proposals must be e-mailed to: ConferenceRFPs@jud.ca.gov(link sends email). Subject line: RFP No. CRS SP 323, Civil Law Institute.

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS SP 323.

The Judicial Council of California, Conference and Print Production does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, non-commissionable.

Request for Proposal (Updated January 10, 2020)

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs

Attachment 2 - Hotel Agreement Template

Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 5 - Submission Form for Technical and Cost Proposal

Attachment 6 - Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.