(a) If, at any time after the court has declared a defendant incompetent to stand trial, and counsel for the defendant, or a jail medical or mental health staff provider, provides the court with substantial evidence that the defendant’s psychiatric symptoms have changed to such a degree as to create a doubt in the mind of the judge as to the defendant’s current mental incompetence, the court may appoint a psychiatrist or a licensed psychologist to examine the defendant and opine as to whether the defendant has attained competence.
(b) Upon receipt of an evaluation report under (a) or an evaluation by the State Department of State Hospitals under Welfare and Institutions Code section 4335.2, the court must direct the clerk to serve a copy on counsel for the People and counsel for the defendant. If, in the opinion of the appointed expert or the department’s expert, the defendant has attained competence, the court must conduct a hearing as if a certificate of restoration of competence had been filed under section 1372(a)(1). At the hearing, the court may consider any evidence, presented by any party, that is relevant to the question of the defendant’s current mental competency.
(1) At the conclusion of the hearing, if the court finds that it has been established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is mentally competent, the court must reinstate criminal proceedings.
(2) At the conclusion of the hearing, if the court finds that it has not been established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is mentally competent, criminal proceedings must remain suspended.
(3) The court’s findings on the defendant’s mental competency must be stated on the record and recorded in the minutes.
Rule 4.132 adopted effective January 1, 2026.