Request for Proposal

Web Access Management System

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2003

Description

A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued on January 27, 2003. The Administrative Office of the Courts is seeking responses from all interested vendors that have proven experience in enterprise-wide web access management systems. The successful vendor will have a demonstrated track record in supplying web access management systems to Fortune 500 companies, providing secure access to web assets with a minimum of overhead, with the ability to scale to 50,000 or more users.

This RFP is the means for prospective vendors to submit their qualifications to the AOC and request selection. The AOC may select, from the responses to this RFP, vendors qualified to provide a web access management system to the AOC.

  • The State reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, as well as the right to conduct or not conduct a similar proposal in the future. This request for proposals is in no way an agreement, obligation, or contract, and the State is not responsible for the cost of preparation. One copy of a submitted proposal will be retained for official files and become a public record.

Vendor proposals must be received prior to 5 p.m. on February 28, 2003, and include all required attachments. Oral responses will not be accepted.

For further information regarding this RFP, please contact Mark Yuan, Information Services Division, Administrative Office of the Courts, 455 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. Telephone: 415-865-7470.

RFP for Web Access Management System

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.