Request for Proposal

Superior Court Print Information Vehicle

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2007

Description


RFP Number: EOP-06-6071-CT

The AOC seeks the services of a service provider/consultant to research, design, and product a Superior Court print information vehicle through a pilot program, and to develop an electronic/internet-based template for such print information vehicle.

There will be no pre-proposal bidders’ conference for this Request for Proposal (RFP).

Questions regarding the solicitation documents should be directed tosolicitations@jud.ca.gov no later than 1 p.m. on Thursday, April 19, 2007.

Proposals must be received no later than 1 p.m. on Monday, May 7, 2007.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

    Judicial Council of California
    Administrative Office of the Courts
    Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP: EOP-06-6071-CT
    455 Golden Gate Avenue
    San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further details regarding the solicitation and program requirements are set forth in Request For Proposals (RFP) No. EOP-06-6071-CT, below:

RFP and Attachments A, B, C and D:

Attachments

  • Attachment E, Payee Data Record:
    PDF Format (162 KB) | April 13, 2007
  • Attachment F, California Courts Online Self-Help Center brochure:
    PDF Format (1.55 MB) | April 13, 2007
  • Attachment G, California Courts Online Self-Help poster:
    PDF Format (1.07 MB) | April 13, 2007
  • Attachment H, Earthquake Preparedness brochure:
    PDF Format (235 KB) | April 13, 2007

Questions and Answers

  • Questions and Answers
    PDF Format (7 KB) | April 23, 2007

Contact Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.