-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2006
Description
The Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) is requesting proposals from highly qualified vendors with expertise in providing copier paper in various sizes and colors on a statewide basis. The Request for Proposal (RFP) is issued on behalf of the California Appellate Courts, which includes the Supreme Court of California, the 58 Superior Courts of California, the Habeas Corpus Resource Center, the county law libraries and the Administrative Office of the Courts (collectively referred to as the Purchasing Group). The AOC intends to award one or more Master Agreement(s), for a one year term with two one-year options to renew to a vendor or vendors that is/are able to supply the members of the Purchasing Group with an unknown quantity of copier paper, as further described in the RFP.
Deadline Extended: Due to late posting of answers to questions submitted to the AOC, the Proposal Due Date and the deadline for questions has been extended. Section II, subsections 2.1 and 2.1.1 are replaced as indicated in Addendum No. 1 to RFP No. FIN-0206. Written proposals must be received no later than 1:00 p.m., March 21, 2006. Oral, facsimile, or email submitted proposals will not be accepted.
Any questions regarding RFP No. FIN-0206CP must be submitted to email address TCSolicitation@jud.ca.gov no later than 3:00 p.m., March 15, 2006. The AOC will post all answers by 5 p.m. March 16. Answers will be posted as on the Courts website, http://www.courts.ca.gov/rfps.htm.
Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposal (RFP) No. FIN-0206CP and the related documents below.
- Entire RFP | DOC Format (413 KB) | PDF Format (193 KB)
- Addendum 1 | DOC Format (46 KB) | PDF Format (13 KB)
- Addendum 2 | DOC Format (32 KB) | PDF Format (8 KB)
- Addendum 3 | DOC Format (34 KB) | PDF Format (11 KB)
- Price Sheets (Excel, 28 KB)
- Amended Price Sheets (Excel, 28 KB)
- Delivery Locations (Excel, 122 KB)
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.