-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2004
Description
With passage of SB1732, the Judicial Council, through the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), has new duties to acquire, manage, and operate court facilities for the State of California. The Trial Court Facilities Act of 2002 Implementation Program (Program), supported by this RFP, will provide the AOC with an integrated Computer Aided Facilities Management (CAFM) system to address the following functional areas: The AOC plans to build, through a phased, long-term approach, a first-class efficient CAFM system able to manage its property from concept through construction to total maintenance and, eventually, demolition. The AOC is seeking proposals form prime contractors, which many be software vendors with integration specialist capabilities, integration specialists, and professional services organizations. The project will be performed in three phases: the first phase will consist of testing and implementing a subset of the functional areas listed above, with a few courts; the second phase will consist of implementing the pilot functional areas on a more wide-scale basis; and the third phase will consist of implementing the other functional areas listed above as optional work as authorized via work orders. Proposals must be received prior to 12 p.m., Tuesday, May 4, 2004. Oral responses will not be accepted. For further information, reference Section 3.1 of the RFP for critical dates pertaining to the procurement schedule and the Transmittal Page for contact instructions.
[replaced - see Addendum No. 2]
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.