-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2016
Description
Update: May 2, 2016
Intent to Award
The Judicial Council, and the Judicial Council on behalf of the Supreme Court of California, the California Courts of Appeal, the Habeas Corpus Resource Center, and the California Judicial Center Library is soliciting proposals from highly qualified proposers with expertise in performing ergonomic assessments for current employees to reduce repetitive stress injuries, foster good health, and self-awareness and reduce compensation costs.
This RFP will result in an award for an initial two-year contract, with the possibility of three consecutive optional one-year terms to one or more qualified service providers.
Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than 3:00 pm, Pacific Time, Tuesday, February 2, 2016.
Proposals must be received by the Judicial Council no later than 3:00 pm, Pacific Time, Tuesday, February 23, 2016.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Attention: Nadine McFadden
RFP No: HR-LV-112015
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation and work requirements are set forth in the RFP No. HR-LV-112015 and related documents provided below:
Attachment 1 Administrative Rules Governing RFPs, DOC | PDF
Attachment 2 Judicial Council Standard Terms and Conditions, DOC | PDF
Attachment 3 Proposer’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions, DOC | PDF
Attachment 4 General Certifications Form, DOC | PDF
Attachment 5 Darfur Contracting Act Certification Form, DOC | PDF
Attachment 6 Payee Data Record Form
Attachment 8 Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise (DVBE) Declaration
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.