Request for Proposal

Data Exchange Program for Juvenile Courts and Child Welfare Partners

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2011

Description

RFP# CFCC-20110826-CT

This RFP is a replacement for RFP # CFCC 06-11-LM which was originally issued May 18, 2011. For several reasons, a contract resulting from CFCC 06-11-LM was never executed prior to the end of fiscal year 2010-2011 and the RFP was subsequently cancelled August 8, 2011.

Under this RFP, the AOC seeks to identify and retain a contractor to develop a statewide strategic plan for sharing information among courts and service providers on children in foster care. This RFP is the means for prospective professionals to submit their qualifications to the AOC and request selection as the service provider for this evaluation.

Questions should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov by 1:00 pm Pacific Time, September 7, 2011.

Proposals must be received by close of business on September 14, 2011.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, RFP No. CFCC-20110826-CT
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CFCC-20110826-CT.

Request for Proposals

Attachment 1: Administrative Rules Governing Requests for Proposals

Attachment 2: Contract Terms

Attachment 3: Proposer's Acceptance of Contract Terms

Attachment 4: Payee Data Record Form

Questions and Answers

Intent to Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.