-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2019
Description
Update: June 5, 2019
Cancellation Notice
The Judicial Council of California, San Francisco, CA is seeking to modernize management of branch data to increase efficiency, maximize opportunities for data analysis, and position the branch to employ more data-drive decision making. One aspect of this modernization effort is to implement a data governance framework to help both the Judicial Council and the courts institute policies and rules around data management. The Office of Court Research, responsible for data, policy, and analysis in support of branch initiatives, has been tasked with leading the Council’s data governance development efforts.
Questions should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received by no later than, May 6, 2019.
Proposals must be received by the Judicial Council no later than 3:00 p.m., Pacific Time, May, 23, 2019.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Bid Desk – Data Governance Consultant
Judicial Council of California
Branch Accounting and Procurement Administrative Division
Attn Sheryl Berry-T, RFP No: CR-2019-04-LV
455 Golden Gate Avenue 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in the RFP No. CR-2019-04-LV and related documents provided below:
Attachment 1 Administrative Rules Governing RFPs
Attachment 2 Judicial Council Standard Terms and Conditions
Attachment 3 Proposer’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 General Certifications Form
Attachment 5 Darfur Contracting Act Certification Form
Attachment 6 Vendor Payee Data Record
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.