Request for Proposal

B.E. Witkin Judicial College of California, RFP# CRS SP 193

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2016

Description

Update: October 28, 2016
Notice of Intent to Award


Update: September 8, 2016
Questions and Answers


The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services seeks proposals from hotels for a full conference, July 28-August 11, 2017 or July 21-August 4, 2017 in San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California.

Please call into the number provided on page 4 of the RFP in order to ask your questions in a public conference call.

Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY Pacific Time, Friday, September 16, 2016.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS SP 193
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS SP 193.

The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, not commissionable.

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs

Attachment 2 - Hotel Agreement Template

Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical and Cost Proposal

Attachment 6 – Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.