-
StatusCanceled
-
Deadline
-
ID#RFP-SC-91323-MS
Description
The Judicial Council of California (“Judicial Council” or “JBE”), chaired by the Chief Justice of California, is the chief policy making agency of the California judicial system. The California Constitution directs the council to improve the administration of justice by surveying judicial business, recommending improvements to the courts, and making recommendations annually to the Governor and the Legislature. The council also adopts rules for court administration, practice, and procedure, and performs other functions prescribed by law. The Judicial Council of California is the staff agency for the council and assists both the council and its chair in performing their duties.
The Judicial Council is responsible for managing certain administrative functions for the Courts in California’s justice system. On behalf of the Supreme Court of California (“Court”), the Judicial Council seeks bids (“Proposal”) from qualified bidders (“Bidders”) for the purchase of two (2) new vehicles.
The Judicial Council seeks goods and services from a person or entity with expertise in the following: Vehicle Purchases: 2023 Chevy Suburban LT (Quantity 2)
Questions should be directed to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than close of business, no later than October 4, 2023.
Proposals must be received by the Judicial Council no later than 3:00 pm, Pacific Time, October 12, 2023.
Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in the RFP-SC-91323-MS and related documents provided below:
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.