Request for Proposal

Experienced Assignment Courses and Juvenile Delinquency Orientation, RFP# CRS SP 296

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2019
  • ID#
    RFP# CRS SP 296

Description

Update: March 21, 2019
Intent to Award


The Judicial Council of California, Conference and Registration Services seeks proposals from hotels for sleeping rooms, November 3-8, 2019 or November 17-22, 2019 or December 1-6, 2019 in Sacramento, California.

Proposals must be received by END OF DAY Pacific Time, March 13, 2019.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS SP 296
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

E-mail proposals:

Proposals may now be submitted via e-mail. E-mail proposals must be e-mailed to: ConferenceRFPs@jud.ca.gov. Subject line: RFP No. CRS SP 296.

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS SP 296.

The Judicial Council of California, Conference Support Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, non-commissionable.

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPs

Attachment 2 - Hotel Agreement Template

Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical and Cost Proposal

Attachment 6 – Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.