Request for Proposal

Bindery Maintenance Services

  • Status
    Open
  • Deadline
  • ID#
    LSS-2024-01-AC RFP

Description

Judicial Council of California. The Judicial Council of California (“Judicial Council”) is the chief policy making agency of the California judicial system. The California Constitution directs the council to improve the administration of justice by surveying judicial business, recommending improvements to the courts, and making recommendations annually to the Governor and the Legislature. The council also adopts rules for court administration, practice, and procedure, and performs other functions prescribed by law. The Judicial Council is comprised of various levels of staff that support and assist the council and its chair in performing their duties.

The Judicial Council maintains an on-site Print Shop which is located at 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 1st Floor, in San Francisco, CA. The Print Shop is responsible for providing high quality printing and bindery services to the Judicial Council staff. The Print Shop is seeking proposals from qualified suppliers to provide on-site maintenance and support services for the Print Shop equipment.

Questions should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than 1:00 pm Pacific Time, July 31, 2024.

Proposals must be received by the Judicial Council no later than 1:00 pm, Pacific Time, August 14, 2024.

Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in the RFP No. LSS-2024-01-AC and related documents provided below:

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.