Request for Proposal

Judicial Branch Data Warehouse and Data Integration Services

  • Status
    Awarded
  • Deadline
  • ID#
    IT-2023-58-DM

Description

The Judicial Council of California (the “Council”) is the policymaking body of the California courts, the largest court system in the nation. Under the leadership of the Chief Justice, and in accordance with the California Constitution, the council is responsible for ensuring the consistent, independent, impartial, and accessible administration of justice. Council staff help implement the council’s policies and provide services to the following Judicial Branch Entities (JBE):

▪ The Supreme Court of California,
▪ The Courts of Appeal,
▪ The 58 Superior Courts of California located in each of the 58 counties,
▪ The Habeas Corpus Resource Center (HCRC),
▪ The Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP), and
▪ The COUNCIL. There are two locations for the Council: San Francisco and Sacramento

The Council seeks information technology (IT) data analytics, data migration, integration, and implementation, and data warehouse support (Data Services) to address the evolving data analytic needs of the Council. Accordingly, this RFP seeks proposals from interested vendors (Proposers) that can provide Data Services support by meeting the needs identified in the Statement of Work.

If you have questions regarding this Request for Proposals, please submit your questions in Attachment 10 (Form for Proposer Submission of Questions) and email it to the Judicial Council of California Solicitation Mailbox at Solicitations@jud.ca.gov prior to 1:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on March 22, 2024.

RFP submissions are due by 1:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on April 19, 2024. The JCC will not accept submissions after the stated date and time.

Further details regarding this RFP are set forth in RFP Number: IT-2023-58-DM and related documents are provided below.

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.