-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2016
Description
Update: June 17, 2016
Notice of Award
Update: May 23, 2016
Notice of Intent to Award
Update: May 18, 2016
Revision 2 Attachment 2
Addendum 5
Update: May 17, 2016
Revised Attachment 2
Addendum 4
Update: May 13, 2016
Addendum 3
Update: May 4, 2016
Attachment A - Specifications, Floor Plan
Addendum 2
Update: April 29, 2016
Questions and Answers
Addendum 1
The Supreme Court of California, established in 1849, is authorized by the California Constitution as the court of last resort in the courts of the State of California. The Supreme Court of California is headquartered in San Francisco and it has a need to expand its file storage capacity at 350 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 .
The Supreme Court of California, in Room 295 of its headquarters, is seeking firms to provide bids for installation and purchase of a new high density file storage system with a capacity for 3,400 lineal feet of document capacity with shelf depth of 12” clear and shelf height of 13” clearance.
NOTE: Questions regarding this IFB should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received by Monday, April 25, 2016, no later than 3:00pm (PDT).
Bids must be received by Tuesday, May 10, no later than 12:00pm (PDT).
Hard copy bid documentation must be delivered to:
Supreme Court of California
c/o Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden, IFB-Supreme-041516-MDS
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further specific details regarding the solicitation requirements are set forth in IFB-Supreme-041516-MDS and related documents provided below:
Attachment 1-Administrative Rules Governing IFBs (Non-IT Goods)
Attachment 2-Supreme Court of California Standard Terms and Conditions
Attachment 3-Bidder’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4-Darfur Contracting Act Certification
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.