Beyond the Bench 2025 | #ID CRS-AK-455 | Request for Proposal

Pre-Proposal Conference Call

The Judicial Council of California will hold a pre-proposal conference call on February 7, 2025

Pre-proposal conference call details were sent separately in the RFP solicitation email. If you did not receive the call-in information, email to request it.

Request Information
Deadline for Questions

Submit questions by end of day February 14, 2025.

Questions and answers received by the deadline will be posted on February 18, 2025.

Deadline for Questions

Status

Closed
Topic

Conferences/Room Blocks
Deadline

February 21, 2025
ID#

CRS-AK-455

Description

Update: February 10, 2025
Questions and Answers

The Judicial Council of California seeks proposals from hotels for meeting space, sleeping rooms and food and beverage for Beyond the Bench 2025.

Dates: November 15 - 20, 2025 or November 29 - December 4, 2025.

Locations: Downtown San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Clara, Downtown Sacramento, Anaheim, Downtown Los Angeles, LAX, Long Beach, Palm Springs, Palm Desert and San Diego.

Proposals must be received by END OF DAY Pacific Time, February 21, 2025.

E-mail proposals to: ConferenceRFPs@jud.ca.gov Subject line: CRS AK 455, Beyond the Bench 2025.

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS AK 455.

The Judicial Council of California, Conference and Registration Services, does not retain the services of third-party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, non-commissionable.

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.