ID/IQ Scheduling Consulting Services, RFP-FS-2023-15-XC
Notice Of Intent to Award
Update: July 15, 2024
Notice Of Shortlist For Interviews
Update: July 1, 2024
The Shortlist for interviews will not be posted today, Monday, July 1, 2024, as evaluations are still underway. The Shortlist will be posted as soon as possible following the completion of evaluations. Please check this website for updates as they become available.
Update: May 24, 2024
RFP-FS-2023-15-XC, ADDENDUM 01
RFP-FS-2023-15-XC, RESPONSE TO SUBMITTED QUESTIONS, ADDENDUM 01
Update: May 6, 2024
Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference Attendance Report
RFP#: RFP-FS-2023-15-XC
RFP Title: ID/IQ Scheduling Consulting Services
The Judicial Council seeks proposals from firms to provide the services of qualified, properly licensed consultants with expertise in all phases of facilities design and construction related to scheduling consulting services of public buildings.
Multiple Consultants may be selected to enter into Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (“ID/IQ”) contracts with the Judicial Council for the consulting services, or for the provision of the services they propose upon.
A Pre-Proposal Conference will be held via Microsoft Teams on Wednesday, May 1, 2024 at 9:00 AM, Pacific Time.
Pre-Proposal Conference (Mandatory) via Microsoft TEAMS
Mandatory pre-registration form: https://events.gcc.teams.microsoft.com/event/c3c3fa9b-b61d-4058-a37f- 3bd38eb5aaf4@10cfa08a-5b17-4e8f-a245-139062e839dc
Questions regarding the RFP should be submitted via email to Solicitations@jud.ca.gov no later than Wednesday, May 8, 2024, by 3:00 PM, Pacific Time.
Proposals must be received no later than Wednesday, June 12, 2024, by 3:00PM, Pacific Time.
The Judicial Council will only accept Proposals in an electronic format. Consultants must submit their Proposals with all required contents in two parts: the Consultant’s Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) and the Consultant’s Cost Proposal (“Cost Proposal”). SOQ and Cost Proposal files must be emailed no more than three (3) days in advance of the proposal due date to the following email addresses:
Email SOQ Proposal to: FS202315XC.SOQ@jud.ca.gov
Email Cost Proposal to: FS202315XC.COST@jud.ca.gov
Further details regarding this solicitation and work requirements are set forth in the RFP and the related documents listed below. Attachments are posted to the RFP webpage as separate documents:
RFP-FS-2023-15-XC, REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, ADDENDUM 01, including:
Attachment A. ADMINISTRATIVE RULES GOVERNING REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS
Attachment B. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA REGIONAL MAP
Attachment C. MASTER AGREEMENT (sample document)
Attachment D. QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
Attachment E. CONSULTANT’S SUBMISSION OF QUESTIONS
Attachments F, G, H, I, J, K, including:
Attachment F. CONSULTANT’S ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Attachment G. GENERAL CERTIFICATIONS FORM
Attachment H. DARFUR CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
Attachment I. IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
Attachment J. UNRUH CIVIL RIGHTS ACT AND CALIFORNIA FEHA CERTIFICATION
Attachment K. PREVAILING WAGE AND RELATED LABOR REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION
Attachment L. BIDDER DECLARATION
Attachment M. DVBE DECLARATION
Attachment N. HOURLY RATES
Attachment O. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCE BOARD IN-USE OFF ROAD DIESEL-FUELED FLEETS CERTIFICATION
Links
PAYEE DATA RECORD FORM (STD 204)
(https://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/fmc/pdf/std204.pdf)
PAYEE DATA RECORD SUPPLEMENT (STD 205)
(https://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/fmc/pdf/std205.pdf)
NOTE: The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.